Institute Of Business Economics

Fisher’s rate means the interest rate where the net present values of two mutually exclusive projects become equal. The paper examines the background and the circumstances of conformation of Fisher’s rate in connection with the aggregate capital needs. Aggregate capital needs is a new conception and gives a new viewpoint to investment project decisions. The paper defines the special content of aggregate capital needs, and compiles an index number for it. The analysis widens knowledge regarding the content of net present value, and highlights the importance of taking the aggregate capital needs into consideration. Fisher’s rate only means useful information in practice if the ranking is made based on the net present value. However, this principle of ranking is in contradiction with the concept of long-term profit maximization. The transformed net present value, which is free of distorting effects (and assuming equal required rates of return,) gives the same ranking list as the internal rate of return. Therefore, Fisher’s rate has no importance in business decisions.
Keywords: aggregate capital needs; investment project decisions; net present value; internal rate of return; ranking; Fisher’s rate
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) code: M21

SUMMARY The paper explores a few hidden problems of the reinvestment rate assumption. The automatism of net present value method creates and applies a very special reinvestment rate assumption. This assumption does not disturb the evaluation of investment projects with orthodox cash flow patterns. However, in the case of unorthodox cash flow patterns, automatism constructs a serious mistake in the calculations. In this case, the net present value provides wrong information about the economic efficiency. However, according to the general academic opinion, the net present value method is suitable for evaluation in the case of unorthodox cash flow patterns as well, as there can be only one net present value as opposed to the opportunity of several internal rates of return. The paper sets out to prove that this way of evaluation is wrong, and works out a solution based on the real economic basis. Keywords: reinvestment rate assumption, net present value, internal rate of return, orthodox and unorthodox cash flow pattern, ranking, aggregate capital needs.

SUMMARY The paper explores a few hidden problems of the reinvestment rate assumption. The automatism of net present value method creates and applies a very special reinvestment rate assumption. This assumption does not disturb the evaluation of investment projects with orthodox cash flow patterns. However, in the case of unorthodox cash flow patterns, automatism constructs a serious mistake in the calculations. In this case, the net present value provides wrong information about the economic efficiency. However, according to the general academic opinion, the net present value method is suitable for evaluation in the case of unorthodox cash flow patterns as well, as there can be only one net present value as opposed to the opportunity of several internal rates of return. The paper sets out to prove that this way of evaluation is wrong, and works out a solution based on the real economic basis. Keywords: reinvestment rate assumption, net present value, internal rate of return, orthodox and unorthodox cash flow pattern, ranking, aggregate capital needs.

SUMMARY The economy, with its driving forces, operating conditions and the consumers' motivation, plays the determining role in the forming of sustainability. The present paper examines a narrower issue within this: the structure of an enterprise model that can be operated in accordance with the requirements of sustainability. The examined model variants essentially differ in risk holder types. The paper discusses two very important criteria of matching to sustainability. On one hand, the smooth operation of the company should not require the existence of the natural rate of unemployment; on the other hand, the driving force related to the success of the enterprise should remain within the company. The model where these two requirements are met concurrently is the working people's enterprise basic model. When the two criteria mentioned above are met, various model variants may be viable. The presentation of the operating conditions and operating mechanisms of these models can build new aspects in the process of sustainability research.

There are some scientific questions related to the NPV and IRR which have not been worked up. From these issues, this paper discusses the economic content of the two categories and the questions of usability for project evaluation and ranking. The main research methods are methodological analysis, model editing and examination of the mathematical formulas. The paper proves that the NPV is the discounted amount of the surplus profit generated above the profit requirement, and points out, that content band of the real reinvestment rate assumption is fundamentally different from everything that can be found about this in the literature. Because of the NPVs are not comparable, the paper systematically eliminates the distortion effects. Thus, the NPV transforms into a special kind of rate, namely, the difference between the factual rate and the required rate of return. This NPV rate (with equal required rates of return) gives the same ranking list as the IRR. The aggregate capital needs is a new conception and gives a new viewpoint to analysis of investment projects evaluation. The paper defines the special content of aggregate capital needs and compiles an index number for it. The paper examines the two main tools of investment project evaluation, i.e. the net present value (NPV) method and internal rate of return (IRR) method. Application appropriateness of the two methods is sharply debated from the first half of the last century. Many writings already were born in the 1950s (see Alchian, 1955; Solomon, 1956; Bierman and Smidt, 1957). Since then the discussion is running. The literature of finance expresses a very determined preference for NPV. In spite of this, business professionals of developed countries apply the IRR in a large proportion for decision-making. For example Arnold and Hope (1990) cite two surveys done in the 1970s and 1980s, demonstrating that the largest British companies (that are otherwise able to pay the best experts) definitely rank the IRR higher than the NPV in practice. They mention that a lot of American surveys prove that the practice prefers the IRR in the USA as well. The practical method preferences are widely researched. Szűcsné Markovics (2012) gives a literature review about the researches on methods which are used by companies throughout the world. Illés and Keszthelyi (1998), Illés (2000) and Daróczi (2004) examined the practical use of different methods based on empirical researches on the complex evaluation of decision-making process. According to my experiences, in business economics literature generally there is not a strong method preference, but the IRR method often seems to be better. Different disciplinary roots According to Volkman's (1997) research, the emergence of method qualification contradiction could be attributed to the fact that finance propagates the more

This paper shows that the various rating calculation methods of business efficiency calculations are built according to a​ unified logic system. It provides an overview of the rich methodological background and presents a transparent system picture. The analysis shows that the general return requirement is the starting point for business efficiency calculation methods, pointing out that only those methods of calculation are suitable for measuring business efficiency which is logically consistent with the general return requirement. It shows also the essentials of the mixed profit categories and presents and interprets the method elements of business efficiency calculations, which can be used to construct various calculation formulas for different business matters. The uniform logic system of method elements may form a guiding thread when selecting and evaluating the correctness of the method used. The paper draws attention to the fact that a number of efficiency-computing conceptions obviously fail to comply with the general return requirement and consequently in such cases may also be preferred less efficient or even inefficient variants.

The main goal of the present study is to provide a comparative analysis between the characteristics of tier one and lower level enterprises (SME’s) in the field of automotive industry and manufacturing. While many of Hungarian SME’s were eliminated by the crisis, those companies have strong relations with production networks (like TIER-1, TIER-2 automotive production companies) in many cases perform still pretty well. The comparison was done based on circulation indicators, capital intensity, and net circulating capital. There is a significant difference between the financing time of tier one enterprises and small and medium enterprises. One of the serious problems of small and medium enterprises is that an average of 17 percent of their invested assets are from short term liabilities. This indicates a significant lack of desirable management modes and conditions of capital. This could be a reason why they were less resistant to the crisis.

The paper summarizes outcomes of recent researches about labor productivity in manufacturing. Moreover examine the existence of linear relationship between output and staff number with cross correlation and regression modelling. The examined period is including the nadir of the crisis and the first years of recovery. In textile and food industries co-movement of time series show a strong correlation between output and staff number. There is a strong positive correlation in the case of automotive industry, but no linear relationship can be proved between the variables in chemical industry.